<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>Software Voices - Business of Software</title>
    <link>http://www.softwarevoices.com/</link>
    <description>Perspectives from commercial developers of consumer software</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.0 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 05:30:17 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Recurring revenue explained as a physics problem -- why management expectations are often wrong</title>
    <link>http://www.softwarevoices.com/archives/15-Recurring-revenue-explained-as-a-physics-problem-why-management-expectations-are-often-wrong.html</link>
            <category>Business of Software</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.softwarevoices.com/archives/15-Recurring-revenue-explained-as-a-physics-problem-why-management-expectations-are-often-wrong.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.softwarevoices.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=15</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.softwarevoices.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=15</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Craig Ogg)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    You have just launched an Internet service that has a subscription model.  Early growth appears to be really strong and you can&#039;t help doing the back of the envelope calculation:  if acquistion continues at this rate 1 million customers is just around the corner!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unless you have been around the recurring revenue block before (or even if you have) your estimate is almost always just a linear extrapolation of your net monthly acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img width=&#039;332&#039; height=&#039;272&#039; border=&#039;0&#039; hspace=&#039;5&#039; src=&#039;http://www.softwarevoices.com/uploads/customer-growth.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;Management often assumes growth will continue linearly, when it fact it levels off as churn grows.&#039; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is almost certainly wrong.   (Explanation after the jump)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.softwarevoices.com/archives/15-Recurring-revenue-explained-as-a-physics-problem-why-management-expectations-are-often-wrong.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Recurring revenue explained as a physics problem -- why management expectations are often wrong&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:30:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softwarevoices.com/archives/15-guid.html</guid>
    <category>business</category>
<category>recurring revenue</category>

</item>

</channel>
</rss>